FAIR Stein Report banner

Home Page

FAIR Staff Contributions

Today on ImmigrationReform.com: DHS Asleep at the Switch, and Biden Advisor Doubts STEM Shortage

Dan Stein Op-Ed: Obama's Imperial Amnesty Decree

Latest Research
The Fiscal Burden of Illegal Aliens on Washingtonians

FAIR Press Release
WA Taxpayers Foot $2.7 Billion Annual Bill for Illegal Immigration

7 Principles of Immigration Reform

Resources & Links
Doing Research?
Visit some of the best immigration information sources on the internet.

Contact Us

All e-mail is subject to print, including your name. If you don't want us to publish your e-mail, or if you would like to remain anonymous, just let us know.

Add Stein Report headlines to your website or blog
Click here for instructions.

A notice to our readers: Comments on the Stein Report will only be posted when they seek to advance constructive debate and discussion, whether or not the poster agrees with the initial posting. Thank you.


Check out FAIR on:

Stein Report center image
June 28, 2011

Unreliability of E-Verify?

By Jack Martin, FAIR Special Projects Director

Critics of E-Verify are increasingly citing a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report that said as many as half of illegal alien workers escape detection by the system. This they claim demonstrates that E-Verify is unreliable and should not be expanded as a requirement for all employers. That claim is hugely misleading.

The E-Verify system is nearly 100 percent accurate. 98.3 percent of employees are automatically confirmed as authorized to work either instantly or within 24 hours, requiring no employee or employer action. Of the other 1.7 percent who are not automatically confirmed, only a few (0.3%) are subsequently found to be authorized to work but first had to correct either the government's or the employer's records. The others did not contest the finding that they were not authorized to work. The half who supposedly are incorrectly found authorized, therefore, would represent less than 1.5 percent of the inquiries.

It is clear that some illegal alien workers escape detection by the E-Verify system, but no one knows how many. The false confirmation percentage cited in the GAO report was an estimate by a government contractor. Since that GAO report was issued, Richard Stana, the GAO director for homeland security and justice, reported to Congress in February 2011, "USCIS has reduced the incidence of ... E-Verify's vulnerability to fraud." And further progress in reducing false confirmations will be made when E-Verify is made a national mandatory system for all employers because the proposed legislation requires SSA to report evidence of false use of SSNs.

The irony in the claim of unreliability of the E-Verify system is that it is not being made as an argument for improving the system. It is cynically being made by defenders of illegal aliens in an effort to prevent E-Verify from being expanded nationwide. They are trying to preserve job opportunities for illegal workers.

We are in the process of archiving old comments so that they may be displayed after October 1st. New comments are being directed to the daily Stein Report post on Immigrationreform.com. Thank you to all commenters on the site - there are over 30,000 comments from the last several years that are in the process of conversion so they can be displayed on the correct pages on SteinReport.com.

To leave a comment, follow this link to today's Stein Report headlines post on ImmigrationReform.com