![]() |
|
September 29, 2006
D.A. King: For Illegal Crossers, Fence Fits the Bill "[K]nowing that more than 10 percent of Mexico now lives in the United States and that more than 40 percent ITS NOT A CURE ALL AR ALL, EMPLOYER ENFORCEMENT PROSECUTIONS ARE MUCH BETTER, BUT ITS A START We are up against very big money and the way to get this snuffed out is put those amnesty employer criminals behind bars. About 10%, randommly, should scare the rest in line, to obey our immigartion laws again. The fence is a symbol though and just the fact it irritates Mexico, makes me support it whole heartedly. Posted by: Softwarengineer on September 29, 2006 01:26 PMIts good to see D.A. smiling. Thats a good sign. DA was one of the first at the barricades who dared to state publicly and frankly that we are being invaded and warned us of the dire consequences we all face if America becomes like Cobb County, or Georgia generally-or large parts of the south in fact. He is a very clear and concise speaker and any of his interviews are worth listening to and easy enough to find on the net. I hate to look a gift horse in the mouth, but I think we will pay dearly for the 700 mile fence (if it's ever funded or built). We'll probably be forced to see the illegals all made "proud" new citizens, each one waving the red, white and green. Posted by: June on September 29, 2006 02:07 PMD.A. King, a man of thought and action. Posted by: Bobby on September 29, 2006 03:57 PMI always liked D.A. King and his ablity to speak out about this issue. I don't see how they could possibly turn millions of Mexicans into legal US citizens without pissing off a majority of voters. If they actually were to get an amnesty of some kind passed I think you would see a whole new meaning to the protest. American citizens will not stand around and let ourselves become a third world nation just so Bush and his cronies can get rich. Brian Posted by: Brian on September 29, 2006 05:08 PMCRITICAL TO MARK THE BORDER. Fact: THERE ARE ONLY PERHAPS 30 miles of fence on the 2000 mile border at this time, 5 miles of that is broken or Sorry, but I'm still reeling about the "Security and Prosperity Partnership" WHAT is it going to take to IMPEACH this traitorous regime? Posted by: Ella on September 29, 2006 06:05 PMWhat is going to take to get someone in Washington to develop a backbone and tell Mexico that taking care of its people is a do-it-yourself job. We've rolled out the red carpet for so long they truly think they are entitled to walk in and get the keys to the country. Wouldn't it be great if our president stood up to Fox and said, "no mas!" This SSP deal really bothers me. Why hasn't any one posed this question directly to Bush? I don't get it..... I agree with Pat Buchanon, that Bush should be impeached for his neglect of our norders and sovreignty. Posted by: mary on September 30, 2006 06:03 PM
10-4 ELLA I'm with you! Start outing the RAT/TRAITORS! It's past time!
SIGN THE PETITION: www.impeachbush.org Posted by: Stephanie on October 2, 2006 04:38 PMSeptember 29, 2006
Votes Today on Border Security in House, Senate "A bill authorizing construction of a fence along the U.S. border with Environmentalists criticized the fence measure, saying it would harm animal migration. "Environmentalists and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wardens say the barrier would disrupt the migration of scores of species from jaguars to hawks and humming birds along a wildlife corridor linking northern Mexico and the U.S. southwest known as the 'Sky Islands.'" The final senate vote on a border fence could take place Saturday. "Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., on Thursday warned that the chamber is headed toward a Saturday session to pass a bill to construct a fence along the U.S.-Mexican border . . . Frist has repeatedly touted the border fence legislation as an important first step in securing the country's borders before enacting a comprehensive immigration bill. The proposal to build a 700-mile fence along the U.S.-Mexico border has passed the House," GovExec.com reported. Build a 2000-foot fence across the entire border! (or however long it is) Get everyone who isn't here legally out of OUR country. We want to restore America to the great country it once was, not continue to turn it into a third-world cesspool! Posted by: Born American on September 29, 2006 12:08 PMIT WOULD DISRUPT THE NORT AMERICAN ALLIANCE BORDER PARK IN 2010 (THEY SHOULD CALL THE NEW PARK, "CHEAP SLAVE LABOR") I heard on CNN yesterday that the N. American Alliance agreement (not our Senate or Congress, just President Bush, Fox and the Canadian) is set for implementation by 2010 (96% of Americans are horrified and against the idea per CNN poll). Here's the CNN Transcript proof in part: "...DOBBS: The results of our poll tonight: 96 percent of you responded that you are outraged that the Bush administration is considering combining the United States, Mexico and Canada, and working diligently, often in secret, to do exactly that, without any legitimacy whatsoever or authorization...." Hey, the fence probably wouldn't be funded by US Senate by then, let alone built, why should the "wrench in the border fence machine" greedy Globalists care? Here's what their control of the US Senate monsters are plotting: http://www.redstate.com/story/2006/3/17/12837/5747 The rest of the CNN report: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0609/28/ldt.01.html Posted by: Softwarengineer on September 29, 2006 01:16 PMBOGUS TESTIMONY ON THE ANIMAL LIFE & ENVIRONMENT! What a crock, I'm well informed on natural history, having been involved with museums and efforts to save the Bonobo Apes in Africa. I have studied Jaguar range & migration. The truth is, a few sensors and camera protected crossings can be provide for animals, for very lttle cost. The trash poisons, the huge presence of aliens is scaring game , and the fires they start will all be reduced by a fences. We DO need to mark the entire actual border with a thick steel cable, placed 5 feet inside the USA. There are no markers closer than a mile apart. Frankly,THE USBP doesn't always know where the border is!I sure hope they fund this as well. This will allow both sides of the barrier fences to be protected from those who would rip them down. The environmentalist are worried that a fence would be bad for the wildlife? Have they seen what the "wildlife" have already done to the border? Trash of all kinds, plastic diapers and bottles, discarded clothing, decayed food, papers, backpacks, you name it. Illegal aliens have turned the borders into a giant dumpster. And guess who pays to have it cleaned up? Posted by: June on September 29, 2006 02:03 PMThe LA TImes reports that Senator Feinstein and Senator Larry Craig are trying to attach the AgJobs Amnesty to the Border Fence Bill. Typical that they put the cheap labor interests of their farm welfare queens ahead of the rest of our security. http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-fence29sep29%2C0%2C2826437.story Posted by: jackbenimble on September 29, 2006 02:23 PMI was thinking about the eminent domain law passed by the Supreme Court awhile back, where cities and other government entities can be allowed to seize property if "they" conclude there is a "better" use for it than what it is being used for at the time. My father used to always get irritated at the idea of the Supreme Court. He used to say, what are these people supposed to be, little gods over Americans? Now I get what he meant. When you consider the passing of these laws,that enable cities to blatantly seize Americans properties, and Bush's plans to merge Canada, Mexico , and our own country,( Known as the Securtiy, and Prosperity Partnership) then it becomes clear why the "Supreme" Court passed these laws. The superhiway is going to require a lot of property seizing, isn't it? Posted by: Bobby on September 29, 2006 03:55 PMAs an animal lover, I don't want to see any harm come to animals, but I think environmentalists are underestimating the adaptive abilities of animals. Here's another reason we need a fence...all 2000 miles of it... Posted by: takn on September 29, 2006 04:53 PMWORTHLESS, TURNCOAT, RATS! I keep hoping that the elections in November will bear fruit in that I hope I see a lot of Amnesty supporters out of a job. If that happens you will see a massive swing to enforcement only. If we just enforced the laws currently on the books we really wouldn't even need a fence, just cameras, sensors and satellites and the ability to shoot anyone who crosses the border illegaly or at the very least a 20 year prison sentance for those that are caught. I promise once you throw a few in prison that would change things real quick. Brian Brian Posted by: Brian on September 29, 2006 05:14 PMI`ll believe all this crap when the fence is actually up and the illegals aren`t invading... The enviromentalists criticize the fence, what a joke!... Where`s their outrage over the tons of garbage and feces left by illegals on the border... I guess to them that`s not an issue... Whatever traitor votes against these bills, throw their ass out of office come election time... We the people have had enough of this nonsense, and it`s time to take back our country, from greedy big business, and the useless, corrupt, traitor politicians! Posted by: American Me on September 29, 2006 05:16 PMI agree with all of you. A fence couldn't hurt wildlife any more than the deluge of illegal aliens. I did some more research on the "Security and Prosperity Partnership" and, they are already trying to take land away from ranchers, etc. Incidentally, did anyone happen to catch Congress on C-Span, this afternoon? They were falling all over themselves, so PROUD they have given our military a lousy 2% raise. Posted by: Ella on September 29, 2006 05:49 PMT H A N K GOD THAT REASON HAS PREVAILED ! Yea Ha! Ya'll are investigating the Security and Prosperity Partnership! Here's you another: Search Hank Gilbert, running for Texas Want more e. coli? Check out The NAFTA Highway and Its Impact on Texas Agriculture on Hank Gilbert's website. I am pleased that both the House and Senate passed the "Fence Bill", however this is just the beginning of returning the United States to the Citizens (and legal residents) . Last night the Media was quick to report the "outrage" of Senior Fox et al, vowing to "convince President Bush to Veto the Bill" as it was not in the best interest of Mexico. They have a PR Firm and Lobbists in Washington, D.C. folks! They meddle in our National Affairs but are outraged when we suggest they Go Home and deal with their own corrupt government! I am afraid we will all soon find out why our Founding Fathers made a point that " The Thanks to the 80 Senators who voted in the best wishes of America, we will have increased border security. You'll notice of the 19 Nays, 17 were Dems, 1 Dem-Indy, and 1 RINO chaffee. Fat Teddy didn't vote. I hope this is the last straw for NJ voters and they vote Menendez out of office and elect Tom Kean to the US Senate. http://stoptheinvasion.blogspot.com Posted by: Virginia Patriot on September 30, 2006 10:13 PMMany Americans who are now so happy about the possibility of a fence being built to stop illegal immigration into the country they love, need to understand something. No fence, no strong opinions, no arguing endlessly, no name calling, no strong declarations--are going to stop illegal immigration. As I have given my opinion on what will, I apologize in advance for stating it again. When AMERICANS CHANGE the POLITICIANS will CHANGE. This means a complete change of attitude involving our country. It means being reconnected, to that which we've become seperated from. What this means on illegal immigration, or on any other matter, is this. Americans have to take personal responsibility, everyday, for what happens in their country. For example, when some politician or city council decides it would be a good idea to make your city a sanctuary city, knowing all that will bring on it and you and yours, you get together with the neighbors and go to city hall and promise them that when election time comes they are finished. Then you acutalize that promise by getting rid of them.The same goes for any politician whos commitment is to anyone else but those who voted for him/her. All of them get swept out. If Americans cared, this country would be blossoming, instead of deteriorating. But just like a garden, it needs constant caring and upkeep. Sublimating, and ignoring everything that bothers us, is the problem. The La Raza's, Mechas, Reconquistas, and ACLU are'nt ignoring anything. Enviro! wacks have little creditbility or they would address the absoulute trashing of our wild areas by Illegals,it's a sin what they are doing! Pro Patria!!! Posted by: Critter on October 2, 2006 09:22 AMSeptember 29, 2006
Illegal Immigrant Movement Deflated "Hispanic and immigration activists were feeling triumphant. The legions Maybe there movement has deflated because they're such pompous a$$holes. I'D KEEP MY MOUTH SHUT IF I WERE THOSE GUYS TOO Hey, they aren't even suppose to be here. I'd stop wiring all the cash south too, save some for your bus tickets back home. Posted by: Softwarengineer on September 29, 2006 01:29 PMI remain skeptical. As long as 1,000,000 or more thirld world aliens are pouring into our country every year while we grant anchor baby citizenship, I would say they have won. All they have to do is let things go the way they are for another 20 years and the 'civil rights' movement will no longer have to hide the real agenda of taking over. As far as I can see, no action is pro-illegal action. Posted by: Bill Dexter on September 29, 2006 02:09 PMbig deal. at best the House will only get weak and symbollic laws. period. a fence was coming anyway. so it may go up. and that is all. no clear act or things that will actually make a difference. big sticking deal. Posted by: dreamact2005 on September 29, 2006 03:18 PMI really cannot believe how arrogant and empowered these people have been feeling the past year or so. What is their problem anyway. My God, they already receive discounts on utility bills, children get free breakfast and lunch in most public schools, free medical and dental care, subsidized housing, discounted mortgages low cost mortgages, food stamps, WIC, job placement, etc.,etc.etc. In California, reconquista politicians, suck-up Democrats, the Catholic Church, and dozens of subversive Mexican "human rights" groups,( from here , not Mexico!) Mexican Embassies, all seek ways to further empower illegal aliens. The results of all this frenetic activity has been bizzare. Mexican flags raised at United States government buildings, and U.S. schools, older Americans beaten by these brave people, vandalism to Americans cars and property, Mexican flags hanging from front porches, mounted on cars, and carried at the "Marches", Americans free speach challenged at every turn, and this is all the "lite" stuff. Forget about the illegal alien drug dealers, rapists, child molesters, cop killers, and murderers. Questions: What more can they receive and how much more can they damage this country?? Posted by: Bobby on September 29, 2006 04:23 PMThis is a nice little victory, but the battle hasn't been won yet. We cannot afford to become complacent. We must keep figiting, if we do not, we will all lose. We have to keep the pressure on Congress, no matter how long it takes. Our country and very way of life is at stake. Posted by: sippy on September 30, 2006 11:58 AMJust look who wrote this article, that: - refers to Rep. Sensenbrenner common-sense immigration reform bill as "the worst immigration bill in a century" and a "punitive approach to immigration" (while the bill merely punishes lawbreakers and outright invaders), - calls immigration lawbreakers "immigrant community" (how offensive this must be to actual immigrants) and their militant leaders "Hispanic and immigration activists" (as if the U.S. weren't the the most inviting and generous country on Earth for immigrants so that they need to be protected and led by the "activists" in order to secure "positive image of immigrants"), and - declares street protests by illegal aliens and their advocates "a new civil rights movement" (how offensive it must have been for the actual civil right movement)? Her name is Marcela Sanchez. Now you know why for years "liberal" activists insisted on hiring persons of Mexican ancestry (often referred to as "Hispanics") by the American mass media and press. Quite a Fifth Column they did set up there, didn't they? 20 million illegals (and don't for a second believe the low estimates the liberals want you to hear) courted by both parties as potential voters? Whatever happened to doing what is right and just according to our own laws? Enforcement-only policy is the way to go, we don't need new laws- we just need to act on the existing laws we already have concerning illegal immigrants. Why is calling a spade a spade such a bad thing in this country? They are here illegally, they have no rights, no privileges, no sanctuary, no legal recourse, no amnesty, nothing. They are criminals- period. As such we should enforce the laws on those businesses that hire these people so that the economic incentive to keep them here dries up. Without jobs, without money, without citizenship- they will leave on their own just to survive. They came here for what their own country couldn't give them and yet they want to leech off the prosperity America enjoys like a parasite with all the benefits and none of the consequences of breaking our laws. Don't bother with a fence or deportation, you're wasting your time and tax money. Just penalize every business, farmer, bank or landlord that gives them a job or a place to stay or a loan and suddenly no one will want illegals here anymore because it will be too costly to keep them. Don't believe all the nonsense about how they keep our economy going, they contribute less than 2% of our overal GDP and that can easily be fixed with respectable wages for citizens who live in those areas where illegals thrive. They are a drain on our society, always have been, always will. If someone wants to immigrate here legally and by the book, God Bless Em- but don't for a minute tell me that just because there are so many of illegals in this country that we must throw our hands up and open the gates- they will bleed this country dry just like they one they came from. Posted by: boanerges on October 2, 2006 09:36 AMEVIDENCE OF THE IMPUNITY OF SOME OF THESE MEXICAN-"American" local elected officials: The Mayor of a rag-tag, slum city about 9 miles north of the Mexican border, ironically called "National City", has had the CAJONES to declare his city a sanctuary city! Now an "illegal" can walk in a couple of hours to a safe zone!That City Council should be "arrested", figuratively for showing their CAJONES publicly, in front of their "Sorry" City Hall ! If nearby San Deigo, is still AMERICA'S FINEST CITY...Then, CIUDAD NACIONAL is now among the most disgusting cities. There prehaps ought to be a "figurative fence" around this pathetic bario of a city! Posted by: Allan S. on October 2, 2006 12:11 PMSeptember 28, 2006
Sen. Kyl: Spin Doesn't Change My Immigration Record "Jim Pederson is now trying to spin his way around the comment When it comes to the serious problem of illegallity , which is what "illegal" immigration is, I don't like this picture of Sen. John Kyl. Just like I don't like the pictures of Sen. Diane Feinstein, in California, or Sen. Barbara Boxer, in California. ALL of these people look far, far, too rested and relaxed. It indicates they are doing absolutely, nothing. Get rid of politicians who watch, when your house is on fire. They are to Americans of all stripes---------WORTHLESS. Posted by: Bobby on September 28, 2006 05:08 PMParking Ticket better enforced than immigration law. IF IT QUACKS LIKE A DUCK, ITS A DUCK There is no mistakes made by amnesty supporting politicians. This one is a clear greedy globalist, vote 'em out. Posted by: Softwarengineer on September 28, 2006 05:45 PMThe 1986 law was a total, "NATION KILLING DEBACLE".Don't for God's sake let it happen again as our final death blow as a nation. Less than 3.5 of Americans,know that BOOSH has formed a new bigger nation to SUPER-CEDE the United States, and it's Constitution,as SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND! He signed the NORTH AMERICAN CO-PROSPERITY UNION into EXISTANCE in Waco,Texas in 2005, with FOX of Mexico, and MARTIN of Canda. He did not bring this to the attention of Congress. To put this in perspective,it would be like he formed a union with Cuba and made Havana the capital, and lets add North Korea,& Iran, so as to operate globally. If he made that deal, more or less unilaterally, he would be arrested, tried, and probably locked up in a prison all to himself, like Napoleon.If innocent people died in making that arrest, he would likely be charged with a capital offence. It simply boggles the mind that he has such cajones! Posted by: Allan S. on September 28, 2006 05:57 PMAmen Jon Kyl Posted by: Sharon on September 28, 2006 06:46 PMAllan S apparently Bush is the only one with cajones the rest of our elected officials don't. Posted by: HELEN on September 28, 2006 09:53 PMJorge Castaneda, who has been part of Fox's administration, stated this in 1995. "The Mexican government, along with the Bush administration until 1992 and the Clinton administration since then, drew up an accord among magnates and potentates: an agreement for the rich and powerful in the United States, Mexico and Canada, an agreement effectively excluding ordinary people in all three societies." He described what they created as a social model in which the corporate investor is king. This happened long before this current administration and long before either of these two administrations. These people didn't come up with this stuff on their own. This crap has been brewing for a longer time than most of us realize. Renato Ruggiero, the first director general of the World Trade Organization, stated in 1995: NAFTAs 1,000 plus pages gave international investors extraordinary rights to override government protections of workers and the environment. It sets up secret panels, rife with conflicts of interest, to judge disputes from which there is no appeal. It makes virtually all nonmilitary government services subject to privatization and systematically undercuts the public sector'a ability to regulate business. Politically, NAFTA and the WTO traded away the interests of the Democratic Party's blue collar electoral base, thanks to Clinton and Gore's efforts. Clinton convinced Congress to approve the vastly expanded worldwide version of NAFTA. The World Trade Organization would generate political stability in the world, create jobs and prosperity according to him. "It is critical for United States leadership in the world," said Clinton. Gore said, "Should Congress fail, history will frown upon us." ( : { ) The World Trade Organization agreement contained 25,000 pages. What I find interesting was one of the provisions was worth $1.6 billion and it went to a cell phone company that was 70% owned by the Washington Post. How does one say "conflict of interest." One of its editorials just days before its passage said it "contains no surprises, no provisions that have not been amply discussed." Really...all this and it was 25,000 pages long? Who in the world believes that snow job? The language of this document, like that of NAFTA, sets up a supranational governance with powers to override what had previously been a province of sovereign states. There are certain principles and norms that are above the reach of any national legislature to alter, set limits on behavior of the governments, define the rights of citizenship, establish judicial systems to interpret their own texts in case of conflicts and provide for enforcement of courts decisions. In the nullification and impairment section of the WTO documents, it allows corporations to challenge laws of any country that can be shown to impair benefits that corporations could expect to receive under the WTO. For example, the Canadian government, on behalf of their asbestos industry, sued France for their domestic ban on asbestos, knowing that asbestos causes cancer. But...this is OK? There are 147 countries in the WTO just sitting around trying to figure who to sue and guess who will end up paying. Those who buy the products probably, taxpayers--definitely. Labor rights are not dealt with by the WTO--oh, no. They are dealt with under the jurisdiction of the International Labor organization, which is a tripartite organization governed by representatives of the governments, business and labor. It is a lot uglier than most citizens of this country even know about. Are people now remembering why the Democrats lost their 40 year control of the House after the Clinton/Gore leadership? Does anyone really believe the Democrats might save us? Remember George Soros and his Open Society Institute. It operates in at least 50 countries. The Center for Public Integrity spent $24 million trying to defeat Bush remember. The Atlantic Monthly did an interview with Soros and this is one of the interesting comments he made at the start of the current administration. "Hijacking fully fueled airlines and using them as suicide bombs was an audacious idea, and its execution could not have been more spectacular." He is a primary funding source for the Democrats and he says this about how American citizens lost their lives on 9/11! He also helped the terrorist enabler, Lynne Stewart, the attorney who helped Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman smuggle messages to Islamic terrorist supporters in Egypt. His Open Society Institute paid some of her legal bills, by the way. George keeps much of his fortune, estimated to be over $7 billion in banks on the Dutch island of Curacao where his Quantum Fund is registered. There he can dodge US corporate taxes, even though he is based in NYC. He is on record stating that he wants affluent Americans to pay higher taxes. He operates a lucrative real estate company from Bermuda, where he can also avoid US taxes. He is for the legalization of drugs, euthanasia and progressive taxation (just don't tax him). "In just a few short years, he has developed a defamation pipeline that can instantly injure anyone in the United States. George Soros is public enemy number 1 for traditional minded Americans. Soros is truly an imposing force and his elite media allies are making even more so. We ignore him at our peril." Bill O'Reilly, Culture Wars, 2006 The US now has the widest gap between the rich and the poor of any industrialized nation in the world. 1% of the population controls 40% of America's assets. More billionaires have been created in the last 15 years than during any other time in US history. The IRS commissioner has stated that nearly $200 billion a year in taxable incomes are not being paid though the actual amount is probably higher. In fiscal year 1989-1990 Clinton/Gore and Congess cut the number of permanent IRS employees by 26%. They cut the number of IRS office examination staff, including revenue agents and tax auditors by 34%. Tax related prosecutors are half what they were 20 years ago. Why in the garish flouting of our tax laws would public officials reduce resources available to enforce those tax law? Aren't the Democrats always saying they are for the little guys, who are now going to have to be the ones who pick up the tab? Something was set in motion long before our current administration. Billionaires are renouncing their citizenship, so they don't have to pay taxes, yet are able to come here for months on end because the law barring their re-entry is rarely enforced. Virtually, untaxable offshore bank deposits (not just from US citizens) are estimated at over $3 trillion. In 1956, the taxes from corporations provided 28% of all federal tax revenue. It is now only 10% and there are a lot more corporations and a lot more wealth. In 1995, 84 millionaires, who hadn't fled the country, filed tax returns on which they owed no income taxes. 17% of roughly 7500 corporations with assets of over $250 million filed returns claiming they owed no income taxes. America is still the greatest show on earth, and taxes are still part of the price of admission. No one should stand above the law. Yearly, there is the Party of Davos that occurs at Davos, Switzerland. It's hosted by global corporation and some 2000 CEOs, politicans, bureaucrats who will network. Americans who participate are bipartisan and have recognizable names. There's also a Party of Porto Alegre, the NGOs who meet at the same time in Brazil. There are demonstrations going on all over the world as well as in this country because we all don't want to be a part of one big shopping mall. How many of us want a global ruling class, where only the elites of the world benefit from the wealth trickling down. Clinton, Gore, Kerry, go often so maybe they can explain their participation there. What is happening with this country is part of what our leaders have signed away--our future for what? It is imperative that people who vote look at voting records and find out who participates in these organizations that are trying to destroy our nation. It cannot all be an intriguing confluence of circumstances, now can it. Posted by: jaded on September 28, 2006 10:18 PMIf you want to find out who Jon Kyl's true masters are, then just look at his top 20 campaign contributors for 2006, which is available at: http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.asp?CID=N00006406&cycle=2006 The list is as follows: 1. Snell & Wilmer $46,650 Notice that Kyl's paymasters include Law firms with large practices in immigration and corporate law, users of H-1B workers, and businesses that employ (or pander to) illegal aliens. That tells you all you need to know about Mr. Kyl, doesn't it? Jon Kyl, Jim Pederson, two worthless politicians playing the game of political spin at the cost of American Sovereignty. Just like Barbara Boxer, and Diane Feinstein of California, there are two Senators in Texas just as worthless. Senators, John Cornyn, and Kay Bialy Hutchison, both talk out of both sides of their mouths. Both are playing both sides of the fence in an attempt to stay in office. Kay B. Hutchison is up for reelection this year, her Democratic oppent is even worse when it comes to giving amnesty to illegal aliens. I'm asking all fellow Texans to look at all the independent candidates. We can no longer abide any politician who supports criminals at the cost of American citizens. Posted by: Bob Hubble on September 29, 2006 09:56 AMBack to Houston, our group Borderwatch has been approached by the police union to participate at a rally in front of city hall to push our officials against the wall on "sanctuary" policy. We have a "crime quilt" that I had been putting together when this story broke.The mayor is sweatin bullets and there is some movement to get ICE to coordinate a fingerprinting data-base set-up to start a serious data-base on offender illegals drug in to be booked. They still are resisting the overturning of the gag order but with cops and council-member Sekula-Gibbs who was walked out on( when she spoke about the policy to get the mayor to rescind)and a talk-show host and member of council, Rep. Culberson(maybe),plus me citing these cheeky blogs and crime stats..who knows what we can do.wish us luck. It took a cop to die before these La Raza -lovin politicians got busy.Any succinct suggestions for the council when I speak for three minutes on Tuesday to get the gag order removed? Posted by: kojak on September 29, 2006 12:08 PM
The last thing we need is another Senator from Arizona who's a Ted Kennedy clone, so those of you in that state, I hope you vote for Kyl. Do so as reluctantly as you wish, but do it. Posted by: lance sjogren on October 1, 2006 07:11 PMSeptember 28, 2006
Q&A With David Bossie, Producer of "Border War" "I recently attended the Washington, D.C., premiere of Citizens Q: What makes “Border War” different from the other attempts by conservative filmmakers?
One (former) member of congress who did NOT see the screening was the aptly named Dick Armey. (See his militant position here: http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/15622572.htm We have a U.S. that has been gripped by the hand of American born Mexicans. Our laws and our government are handicapped and ineffective against the Mexicans for some reason. Even our law enforcement personnel are being arrested and tried for enforcing our law. Whatever the reason is for the manipulation of our government, I urge people to wake up any way possible, get all the information possible. I can hardly wait to see this film. Congradulations for the popularity of this film. Posted by: Johhny Bell on September 28, 2006 02:03 PMI plan on getting this DVD when released. I also plan on asking my congresswoman if she plans on watching it. Everyone here should make sure your congressman/woman see this. Brian Posted by: Brian on September 28, 2006 02:21 PMAngus, I remember listening to Dich Armey being interviewed by a talk show, years ago. He went on to babble about how there' no need for a minimum wage, and how there was no minimum wage when he was a youth and worked all kinds of manuel labor jobs. Apparently, this ass, does'nt realize that it isn't the late 1940's or 1950's anymore, when employers had to compete to get people to come work for them. No, the fat, bloated, Dick Armey types, have received the benefits of an America that once was, and that, if it's up to him, will never be again. He makes me puke. Posted by: Bobby on September 28, 2006 04:54 PMLET'S NOT THROW THE LIBERAL BABY OUT WITH THE BATH WATER I agree that liberals now call me Conservative on illegal aliens, but that's ludicrous too, I'm a 90s liberal. 90s Liberals didn't want amnesty either. Same with Michael Moore, some of his facts about the Iraq War were true in my opinion, some were not in other's opinions. We can all agree in FAIRUS.ORG, Liberal or Conservative, George Bush's support of amnesty is ludicrous. Posted by: Softwarengineer on September 28, 2006 05:52 PMAnyone's support of amnesty is ludicrous. How in the world is it ever OK to just totally forget the crimes that foreigners commit when they enter our nation. These are crimes against US citizens and our country itself. It is never OK to pretend these didn't happen because all of us don't choose to live in some sick politically correct deluded state. We all believe in the letter of the law for it creates social order. What does amnesty create but more discrimination. Posted by: jaded on September 28, 2006 09:20 PMYour right about that sofwarengineer, as a matter of fact 90% of the things GW does are ludicrous. No party lines when it comes to amnesty the answer is NO Posted by: HELEN on September 28, 2006 10:00 PMWhy can't we get Boarder Wars on Fox TV or Lou Dobbs Now? Where can we purchase it? With election time looming lets get out in the publics face. Posted by: Don Fischer on September 29, 2006 01:59 PMI go to the site, enter, it downloads all the way till about an 1/8 of an inch from the end of the bar. Is this a movie for online? Is what I am trying to get to a movie trailer? Ad? What? The site says nothing much about it... what it is, etc... Stein Report -- How about a link or explaination on the movie, or ??? We need to have copies (if DVD) sent to all house of reps and senators, campaign centers, etc... Posted by: Greg on September 29, 2006 07:35 PMMost people now know the issues by now. What they do not know is which congressman and wannabes are on the publics side. Mass emails could be used to post the urls of people like Armey.The public easily saw through the scam Pence was trying to pull. Let the bad guys condem them selves with their own words. Maybe the public will vote them out. Posted by: James J on September 30, 2006 09:08 PMSeptember 28, 2006
Two Mexican Officials Arrested in Tunnel Investigation "Mexican federal police arrested two customs officials and three others on I wonder why the DEA isn't seen busting drugs on the border? I wonder why the border guards were punished instead of the drug dealer? I wonder why drugs keep comming in when we could stop them with a fence? Not a virtual fence, which they can get drugs around, but a real fence. I wonder why the Indians get to keep half the drugs they confiscate? What do they do with them? I wonder if any of the Senators are getting paid off by Mexican drug dealers? It just seems like it would be really easy to stop the drug dealers walking across the border with bales of dope and cocaine, why aren't they? Why don't they watch these tunnels for months and follow the drug dealers to all their contacts? You know, all the street dealers. They could bust hundreds of dealers when they find a tunnel. Oh well, I'm not smart enough to figure these things out. It seems like the Mexican drug dealers are protected by our government instead of arrested. Posted by: princess on September 28, 2006 12:48 PMWhen in the hell are we going to start using tech such as infra-red sensors and other types of tunnel sensors to find all of these tunnels. God only knows what the hell is being smuggled into my country. Brian Posted by: Brian on September 28, 2006 02:23 PMAnd that impotent current president of mexico and the next impotent president of mexico are strangely silent on how yet more of their corrupt government officials are invading our nation with their drugs, violence and disgusting people we are supposed to tolerate. I cannot for the life of me understand people so corrupt, so inept at functioning as Vincente Fox and his administration. How can they even look at their sorry selves in the mirror in the morning. They are not men, they are not males--they are children who are need of products from DEPENDS to pacifiers. My God, I hate this disgusting country and everyone in it, everyone from it and I just wish some enormous national disaster would just take it off the face of the earth. How is the Catholic Church going to explain this one away, when they are whining about how we need to help the poor of Mexico? To quote Jay Leno..."Shut up!" If this doesn't prove that mexico isn't our friend, then what does it take? Drop the bomb on them and make them go away! Posted by: jaded on September 28, 2006 03:47 PMLike this (corrupt Mexico) is any big surprise to anyone, but our government officials who choose to be blind and concern themselves only with providing help to "poor immigrants." God, the ineptness and inaction of our government is sickening. Posted by: Born American on September 28, 2006 04:50 PMITS A BIG HAPPY ORGANIZED CRIME FAMILY OVER THERE I imagine the Mexican Mafia pays the Mexican Border Guards well too. Posted by: Softwarengineer on September 28, 2006 06:00 PMSeptember 28, 2006
Intel, Microsoft Among Companies Pushing Back-Door H-1B Increase "With Congress due to recess tomorrow, advocates of [H-1b increases] have Any individual can sue Intel for not following the rules on HB1 visas. Just watch and when you can find someone who is overstaying, sue them for 100 million. Posted by: princess on September 28, 2006 12:52 PMThis issue really hits home with me. I work in the information technology sector, and I recently was laid off from a healthcare service firm that contracts with Perot Systems for indian software programmers and testers. Some of the indians are here on H1B visas and some are employed by Perot overseas. One of the Perot indian “Quality Assurance” engineers went around behind our backs telling the management that the American tech workers were “unproductive” and that the Perot offshore team in india could do a better job. Sure enough, the company I worked for laid me and other Americans off while keeping all the indians. A former co-worker still employed at this firm told me that the company even brought over more indians after the Americans were laid off. This person told me that quality has suffered but management doesn’t care because the labor costs are lower now. I replied that since this company is in the pharmacy services industry they BETTER care about quality. It’s time that liberal and conservative citizens put aside their social differences and unite against the executives who are bankrupting us and our nation for the sake of their own short term profit. The H-1B visa is a method used by "Rat Employers" to import foreign skilled workers to displace American workers at wages Americans could not exist on. I saw this done in Silicone Valley in Northern California in the 1980's. The "Rat Employers" would contract whole apartment complexes to house the foreign workers. They could bring these people in, pay, and house them, cheaper than hiring Americans because they could work these people long hours without just compensation. When local news agencies started asking embarrassing questions, the "Rat Employers" threatened to pull all advertising, which of course stopped that. The H-1B visas have effectively curtailed Americans from entering the engineering field because Americans know they can't make a decent living at it as long as these "Rat Employers" are allowed to undermine American jobs with extremely cheap labor. Posted by: Bob Hubble on September 28, 2006 02:09 PMIntel just announced a major layoff but are still trying to get more H1-B workers. Where is hell is congress on this issue? Intel and Microsoft both are UnAmerican as you can get. Brian Posted by: Brian on September 28, 2006 02:25 PMIntel is going through a massive restructuring with large numbers of people being laid off, so why do they need foreign workers? Posted by: Bob on September 28, 2006 02:31 PMI do not feel sorry for Andy Grove, founder of INTEL. Over the years, He has routinely opened Plants on foregin soil, to avoid; paying decent wages, compliance to labor laws and taxes. Just this past week, the INTEL Headquarters in Santa Clara, California laid off approximately 250,000 Employees. Is this so they can hire 350,000 H-1B Visa Workers to replace them? If these are the Values this "brilliant" Immigrant from Hungary (Grove), brought to the United States, he is certainly in the "Greedy Globalist Club" and is truly not a "Real" U.S. Citizen. Citizenship papers do not instill values. The United States has plenty of Tech Professionals. These Greedy CEO's just want to "import cheap labor" to increase profits. I know many "U.S.-born scientists" who left the Industry as they were replaced by this "import labor force" who would work for far less. The corporate execs and members of our bought-and-paid for congress like to mouth off about how H-1B allows us to tap into the “best and brightest” talent from around the world and how our economy would crumble without these workers. Well, I beg to differ. VDARE recently published an excellent analysis which details the various failures and problems encountered by companies who import H-1B workers. This article is available at -> http://www.vdare.com/letters/tl_082606.htm#b3 Pay special attention to the connection between the voting machine companies and H-1B. This could explain why those machines are so unreliable. Why don't Intel and Microsoft start their own college? They could have associate and bachelor degrees in tech, and offer whatever pay they wanted. Provide wage increases with experience and teach the American kids exactly what they need? Or, they could get the hell out of America. Posted by: princess on September 28, 2006 02:56 PMI know someone who has worked for Intel since that person got out of college. The pressure on the workers of that company has been so great for the past couple of decades that a great many of this person's coworkers, besides themselves, have been on anti-anxiety or anti-depressant medications for year and years to try to cope with the abuse of this company. I don't understand the belief that ruining one's company's reputation is the way to go. How in the world does one can thousands and then turn around and say they need workers? This is exactly what the healthcare industry has done however. Those of us who have over 20 years experience get laid off and the facilities cry that there are no workers. They just don't want to pay the salaries for the experience. It makes no sense to me when one considers productivity, the fact that fewer mistakes would be made and there would be stability that occurs when people have worked together for a long time and the team is really clicking. DC politicians silence on this matter is deafening! Posted by: jaded on September 28, 2006 03:40 PMTo Intel, Microsoft and others America is just a place, like any other, to exploit people and make a few stockholders richer. This is how far their feelings go for the country and its people, despite the fact that it was Americans that made them rich in the first place. And have you ever noticed when they all talk about giving back, its always to some foreign country. Posted by: Bobby on September 28, 2006 03:40 PMENGINEERING ON THE CHEAP Oh yes, there are significant amounts of unemployed engineers and ITs in the USA, similar to the general unemployment rate. Still, they bring in more and more unknown numbers of H-1B Guest Workers. CNN asks them how many are here, they say, "we don't know." Perhaps the Greedy Globalists in the USA really mean, "we don't care and go to Hades, CNN"? I'll pick a number out of the air, there's 10-20 million illegal aliens working in the USA, so I say there's 10-20 million H-1B guest workers working in the USA too. My guess is as good as any. Posted by: Softwarengineer on September 28, 2006 03:51 PMI am fortunate enough not to have been harmed economically by H1b yet, but I and my family recently had a bad experience with an H1b import and his family. Over two years ago a man from India rented the house next door to me. He told me that had just been hired by Nortel Networks. He mentioned that he hoped to get a green card eventually so he could get off of H1b. He seemed quiet and well-mannered at first. But then his wife and two children soon joined him, and the *FUN* started. They played what sounded like Our family thought about moving, as many citizens do when confronted with third world style deterioration. But instead, we stood our ground and filed police reports about the loud music. After more than a year of getting visited by the police on nights and weekends, the offenders finally moved out. It was a tough battle but our self-esteem is much higher now because we stood up for our rights. The third world invasion is so widespread that chances are if we had moved to another city we would have been faced with the same type of wretched behavior all over again. In addition to the financial hardship that this program causes citizen workers, we should also consider the cultural impact of importing so many third world people to work in critical industries. This is cool. I know a "high tech contracting firm" owned by a clever Indian feller who "hire" H1B candidates left and right without actually giving them a job. His company only provides a facade. Once H1B visa is secured his hired fellow countrymen are required to find a real paying jobs somewhere else and then he subcontract them to these positions. He pockets the money as a middlemen, foreigner employee is happy being rescued from his own country (boy,if you were in India or China recently you might understand why) and the business who actually pay the H1B dude is happy too, having a desperado who will do absolutely anything for an ultimate price, staying in the U.S. The money for the job is only an extra benefit. Posted by: George on September 28, 2006 05:20 PMSo we wait until after the election to push through legislation that most Americans do not want. Is this the way we are represented? If there is truly a shortage, then give grant money and incentives to American students and American colleges and high schools. Americans would flock to that field like bees on honey. With all the people in this country, I find it hard to believe that there is a shortage of anything. I know someone who graduated from Georgia Tech and had to go all the way to Pennsylvania to get a job in the IT field. Posted by: Sharon on September 28, 2006 06:44 PMIt's almost impossible already to find anything made in America. Made in America company's should advertise so we know who and where they are. My husband is still looking for work in the electronics field he went to school for mean time we have to pay the student loans. With all the stuff going on in the house and senate today and tomorrow we may not have to worry, GW will have dictatorship papers and we will have to work where he want's us to and for whom or we will be considered terriorists and put in jail in some 3rd world country and then they can bring over all the cheap labor they want and the Americans won't get in the way. God Help America Sickening! These two companies mentioned here have made billions off the backs of americans and it appears they are not willing to put the money back into the men and women of this country! If they need more educated IT or other types, then all those bill gates billions he is collecting he could put into a super high tech training program or scholarships for elevated high tech programs in our colleges. I am a IT in the Navy and have lots of young kids working for me... it is shameful that they are trying to get their degrees in IT and serve the country in IT jobs... while the civilian sector they are counting on is selling their jobs down the road for cheaper wages saying that they do not have enough talent in the states! Bull----! There are so many talented and skilled folks out there that they will not hire... why? They now want to bring in hadji or radji from hindustan and pay 1/3 to 2/3 the wages...pocket more profit! Americans need to wake up and kick some congress ass to stop this outsourcing of America! Posted by: Greg on September 28, 2006 10:11 PMThe FIRST thing most H-1B's do when they get here is have a kid aka Anchor baby; their kid will be a U.S. citizen. That way they dont have to go back when their visa has expired. They can stay, bring the 30 other family members as well. So what is the point in having a visa program when somebody receives a visa, they are just gonna have kids here anyway? My big question is why do we have to assimilate other cultures when those other cultures fostered the 3rd world atmosphere they came from? When is it ever gonna end? Call me a Xenophobe, but we will be a 3rd world country unless we get a Sessions/Tancredo ticket in 2008. Posted by: villager on September 28, 2006 11:25 PMNothing less than the elimination of the H-1B program will be necessary to rebuild the American tech professions. As long as Big Business like Intel and Moto can cry "Stupid Americans" and pay bribe-contributions to politicians, we will have a never ending flow of job thieves. Maybe we can sabotage the H-1B by EXPANDING it; let's add on auto assembler, diversity officer and sanitation engineer! Posted by: George Elkerton on September 29, 2006 09:13 AMThe following quote (from the WP article) sent chills down my spine: "With Congress due to recess tomorrow, advocates of the programs have given up on winning immediate change. Now they're hoping members of Congress will focus on the issue in the lame-duck session late this year." Sure enough, Senator Cornyn (R-TX) wants to push thru his SKIL Bill (S 2691 in the Senate and HR 5744 in the House) that contains massive increases in H-1B Visas, Green Cards, and Student Visas. You get text and the congressional record of this bill by going to http://thomas.loc.gov and entering S 2691 in the search box. Cornyn's legislation will probably come up in a lame-duck session which is scheduled to begin on or about November 13. Inexplicably, FAIR and other immigration reform groups seem to have all but ignored this dangerous legislation. FAIR, Numbers USA, and Team America PAC need to quickly mobilize to defeat the SKIL bill. If this bill passes (either by itself or with its provisions included in an end of year Omnibus spending package), then hundreds of thousands of current and future American white collar professionals and their families will be economically ruined. Furthermore, Americans will be completely banished from these industries within 10 years. I am appalled at the failure of our major corporations to invest in American citizens...Microsoft could have its own hand-picked, tow the company line prospects, right out of high school and college, but they would rather get the work done on the cheap and leave our citizens to spin in the wind! We have to demand that Congress stop this nonsense and demand investment in our people. No more foreigners need apply! Posted by: takn on September 29, 2006 11:13 AMCHINA IS STEALING OUR SECRETS CNN reported yesterday that China has a laser now that can block our spy satelites. The CNN report: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0609/28/ldt.01.html How did they develop it? According to CNN: they send their students over here and I imagine their H-1B Guest Workers infiltrate our high tech companies; the rest is just a copy machine I also imagine. The military portion of our government is highly alarmed about this insideous Chinese laser, while our "fat politician" greedy Globalists portion are asleep at the wheel, as they don't want to step on any new world order cheap labor toes. God help us! Posted by: Softwarengineer on September 29, 2006 01:46 PMBoycott? Leave all those iPods, etc on the shelves for a while. Don't flock to the stores for Christmas... That just might send a very strong message to a lot of folks. I agree - it is BS that we do not have enough techs, scientists, etc. Educational opportunites are constantly being eroded, and we have American corporations investing in educations overseas for foreigners, gaining their loyalty, and undercutting Americans for jobs. Our schools are overrun with illegals, and our children are being deprived of quality educations. Just another lousy excuse for hiring cheap labor, skirting employment laws, fattening their bottom lines, and thumbing their noses at Americans. Boycott them! Posted by: Barb on September 29, 2006 04:07 PMIdiots like those at Intel and Microsoft, should get the hell out of America, along with illegals. It is almost over folks. Our republic is only a hollow shell. The Rockefellers ($11.48 trillion net worth) and Rothschilds ($100+ trillion est net worth), own all the Central Banks of the world, they own all the govts of the world, and they own YOU. What a bunch of idiots who think posting in this forum changes reality that we are now slaves. Oh God! The ignorance of so many ppl around here is as high as those sitting in the House/Senate.
2) Intel laying off 250,000 ppl?? What are you guys smoking? Please give me some too so that i can forget all the problems too and smoke away my life in this ignorance bliss. 3) Laid off, sorry too bad. DId you ever consider the fact that probably your technical skills need a brush up? You need to be pro-active and take initiative in many things? ..I can go on and on ... My only advise to all you people is to be level-headed, do some research before posting your comments. Otherwise you are just going to reveal the feet in your big mouths. Posted by: boreal on September 30, 2006 01:16 PMboreal, Before you condem your fellow U.S. Americans (if you are a U.S. American?), do your own research. Read some International Newspapers (many are underground) and you will discover that many these IT Companies are Global and have Plants and Employees in Places that YOU may have never heard of. Information made available to the U.S. Media is filtered through Governments that laugh at the concept of Free Press/Free Speech. Many of the Corporations are operated outside of U.S. jurisdiction (incorporated offshore), so that they are not required to reveal information regarding operations outside the United States. Your comments reaval that you just may be a Member of the Greedy Globalist Elite. Posted by: Braveheart Offspring on October 2, 2006 11:46 AMIn the current era of globalization there are ONLY jobs and nothing called American jobs and Canadian jobs. So all these retards who speak in terms of protectionism should introspect about the American role in this process. Just remember one thing you can't have your cake and eat it too. On one hand you want the stock market to boom, real estate to boom and you want everyday low prices for your consumer goods. Well friends wake up and smell the coffee, this is not going to happen without globalization. All these pro protectionists commenting on this forum are trying to create a niche market for themselves and want to inflate their own salaries by creating a artifical scarcity in the workforce. I work in a firm in Silicon Valley which was set up by an Indian immigrant. He is a PhD in Microelectronics, which means that he is a million times smarter that all these buffons over here. Dont just sit on your asses and crib about the American dream coming to an end. Get on and move on with your life because now it is a global field and not some American elitist playground. I am an American and I can clearly see the current generation partying and boozing, while their competitors half way around the world slog their ass out and work hard even on weekends. Instead of complaning all protectionist buffons on this website need to get their act together. Posted by: prince_waiting on October 2, 2006 04:06 PMprince_waiting writes: "All these pro protectionists commenting on this forum are trying to create a niche market for themselves and want to inflate their own salaries by creating a artifical scarcity in the workforce. I work in a firm in Silicon Valley which was set up by an Indian immigrant. He is a PhD in Microelectronics, which means that he is a million times smarter that all these buffons over here." What is the name of the firm you work at, and who is the Indian Immigrant you speak of? Is he/she here on an H-1B or did he/she immigrate with parents as a child? If you are going to post here and call us buffons then you need to give some specific facts to back up your claims, else your arguments will convince no one. I have worked alonside H-1B techies for 10 years and I can tell you that very few of them could truthfully be called "the best and brightest". As a group, they are average at best, and many of them are very poor. You want specifics? Well, recently I held a programming position at Verizon Wireless in Irving, Texas. They used H-1B IT workers extensively. We were developing a Customer Relationship Management software application using Java and J2EE. We did incremental releases (builds) every week. I routinely had to go in and correct compile-time errors in code written by several of the Indian H-1B programmers. Run-time errors in beta releases are fairly commonplace, but the code writtem by these H-1Bs from India wouldn't even compile!!! A number of the Indians didn't even know the basics of the Java programming language and had to refer to textbooks constantly. As for your remarks about protectionism, do you even realize that manufactured goods going from America to China are subject to a 25% tariff levied by the Chinese? Also, goods coming from China to the U.S. are subject to only a 2.5% tariff, so you see, it is China, not America, which is practicing protectionism. India practices protectionism also, since it is much harder for an American to emigrate to India than for an Indian to emigrate to the US. Your so-called arguments are weak, have little if any basis in fact, and are of no merit. Posted by: HP on October 3, 2006 10:28 AMProtectionist?!!! These new nouns, such as "protectionist" and "nationalist", used in a derogatory manner and in place of the old word, "patriot," only serve to convince me that our schools have been invaded and a couple of generations have been brainwashed. In the end, nothing will matter to you. Posted by: Faye on October 3, 2006 01:15 PMShelby Moore -- We're not just posting on this forum. This is info / venting, and even this is being observed. We are also taking action. This forum has probably resulted in at least 200 e-mails from me alone to the President, Congressmen, candidates for office, editors of newspapers in a very short amount of time. FAIR sent lawyers to Hazelton to help them out. They also intervened in the sentencing of the two Border Patrolmen and that has been delayed indefinitely while it is being investigated. Over the summer vacation for Congress, we were able to voice enough complaints that the fence has passed both House and Senate and the amnesty program put on hold. We boycott places that hire / support illegals and send thanks to the ones obeying the law. I switched from Walmart to HEB the other day and went to the manager, told him I had switched, congratulated him on his polite staff and told him I noticed he was hiring the local high school students. So, see, it's not "just posting." Take some Cymbalta and join the fray. Posted by: Faye on October 3, 2006 04:38 PMIf the US levies only a marginal duty on the goods then it is not China's fault, it is the US government's fault isn't it? If Americans are ready to pay 10 times the existing costs for their daily groceries then they are more than welcome to boycott the Chinese goods. prince-waiting, it is greed that is the problem. This country , made it's historic rise to the pinnacle of power, for the most part, without any outside help whatever. It could be completely self-sustaining. I think you have completely bought in to the bogus arguments of big business. The idea that Americans would have to pay 10x more than the existing cost of groceries is one I have heard before, and is totally absurd. A globalists strawman arguement. Posted by: Bobby on October 3, 2006 06:46 PMAngry Tom,
prince_waiting writes: > "I work in a firm in Silicon Valley which was set up by an Indian Ummm... if there are only "buffons over here" (sic), and you cannot find employable One simple reason reason Mr. AverageJoe and that would be consultation supplied by our firm to global businesses like Intel, Motorola and AMD. The chip design business has already been shifted to India and China because of lack of technical manpower in the sophisticated field of microelectronics, resulting in a loss of nearly 12 million dollars to the state of California. Also the US army and navy are interested in accessing our technology because they could not find any suitable mid sized 'American owned' business to give them that. Posted by: prince_waiting on October 4, 2006 12:25 AMprince_waiting writes: "if you want a case for how Americans are not up for maths and science degrees, here is one. When our company was growing from a 6 employee form to a 30 employee hi tech enterprise, out of the 15 engineering positions, 10 were filled by foreign students with advanced degrees. This was done because only 5 American engineers turned up for job interviews in 6 months." That doesn't mean that Americans are "not up for" degrees in science and technology. It merely means that fewer American students are choosing to major in those subjects. American students recongize that, because employers prefer to hire H-1B foreigners at a lower wage, the opportunities for Americans in the high tech industries are fading fast. Economist Edwin Rubenstein has done studies which show that the number number of American students who graduate with engineering and science degrees rises and falls with the number of job opportunities in those fields. Also, you should realize that H-1B, free trade, and government tax incentives for offshoring do not represent true free market capitalism. These practices represent corporatism, which is a system of government where wealthy executives and investors pay large amounts of cash to elected officials, who then craft economic policies which allow those who are already wealthy to amass even more wealth at the continued expense of the citizens. H-1B is a prime example of this, because to a large extent it uses taxpayer dollars to artificially depress the wages in key industries, which, in turn, financially harms the families of the taxpayers who are funding the program. All of this has occurred without the consent of the citizens. Posted by: HP on October 4, 2006 10:07 AMSeptember 28, 2006
Another Victory in Mohawk RICO Case for Foster "The 11th Circuit has reinstated our RICO victory[against Mohawk]. Individuals should sue every single Senator for not enforcing our immigration laws. The president should be sued for not enforcing our immigration laws. The Mexicans have everybody paid off. If the American citizens want to keep America they had better FORCE the Senate to enforce the law. I think that this is what the Senate secretly wants but can't come straight out and say it. I think they have got in trouble and can't figure a way out. But, if we don't do it by January, there may be no time left. SUE the U.S. government for not enforcing our immigration laws. Posted by: Parker on September 28, 2006 01:03 PMDon't vote for Pederson in Az. Senate race. He's a guest worker advocate. Vote for Kyl but make him promise that he'll vote against the guest worker program and amnesty. He's got all these sheriffs advertising on his side, but I haven't seen a promise from him saying he won't vote for these things. I think the whole race is an immigration ballot. Kyl makes me nervous because if you look at his campaign donations they are from lots of big companies that could use illegals. e-mail Kyl and make him run an ad saying he'll vote against a guest worker program and amnesty. Posted by: Bootinur on September 28, 2006 01:13 PMI hope Mohawk's assets are seized the Turncoat/Traitors! Posted by: Critter on September 28, 2006 01:38 PMI'm glad that the 11th circuit reinstated the RICO case. With this as case law other lawsuits will be filed. We need to start with all the fast food places such as McDonalds and Wendys who are a major employer of illegal aliens. Brian Posted by: Brian on September 28, 2006 02:28 PMI am loving this! Maybe it is time for more hardwood floors in America, installed by American citizens for American citizens. Posted by: jaded on September 28, 2006 03:34 PMBest case scenario Just sit back and watch. Mr. Foster is going to have rich pickins. It makes me want to go and get a law degree. Sharp lawyers, who throw themselves into the immigration fray are going to get wealthy. Imagine the possiblilties for class action suits. Posted by: Bobby on September 28, 2006 04:39 PMTHE MIDDLE CLASS ARE MARCHING STANDING STILL The average American household incomes are stagnant since the late nineties, yet greedy globalist price increases during that period were nonstop. This lawsuit victory is for all of us. Posted by: Softwarengineer on September 28, 2006 05:42 PMJaded, hardwood floors are the best easier to care for too. There is no way to make our elected officials listen, they lie. Both parties are greedy and out for themselves and selling us out at every turn. Even McCain caved in to Bush do you thing any of the others will stand up to him? I have never seen so many men without b***s in my life. Bush doesn't pay them we do, infact we pay him too. We can demand all we want we may have to stand up phyically to accomplish anything. Heard a bunch of war protesters got arrested for a peaceful demostration guess you have to be an illegal to have rights in America now. Posted by: HELEN on September 28, 2006 09:46 PMGood...more lawsuits like this and maybe corporate America will get the message...but it would seem that very few in our judiciary have the "cajone's" to even attempt it... Posted by: takn on September 29, 2006 11:20 AMNow we need to begin suits against public officials who aid and abet crime, provide taxpaid benefits to illegal aliens in order to pander votes for their careers, and anyone who wants to use our taxpayer resources to play Santa Claus for illegal alien or their causes, i.e. La Raza, etc. Posted by: glr on September 29, 2006 02:32 PMI've always held that the RICO Act was the way to attack them where they will feel the most hurt. Now, what do we do about the State, County and Local Governments who knowingly close their eyes and either hire Illegals or - allow their contractors to hire Illegals? Does the RICO Act apply? As for Senator Kyl - he does receive a lot of cash from profiteering big businesses, but, let us not overlook the fact that Bush came to Phoenix and raised $2 million and Laura came to Phoenix and raised $1 million and the RNC came to town and raised him somemore and now he has been endorsed - just recently - by McCain and a few other anti-american traitors, such as Ken Melhman, etc. Also consider the fact that Kyl and Cornyn of Texas co-sponsored a reasonably good piece of legislation and then when Bush entered the fray - they abandoned that like it was a hot stove. Now, we see both Cornyn and Hutchinson embracing an anti-fence stance - but voting to build and fund 700 miles. What does this all mean? Get ready to be disappointed once they get re-elected - and they will, because americans just love to be beat up and make promises to their children that will never be kept. Kinda makes us all look just like the politicians we keep putting back in office - doesn't it? As for me - partisan politics can go to hell. I will never again vote for the lesser of two evils, because the demon you vote for works for the devil you don't. I am prepared with my write-in candidates for 2008 and by writing them in - in 2006 - it will send a message that the battle for America has not ended in the mid-term, but will be carried over to the one that really counts. What joy we will have when we can have a pro-American President who is not afraid to sign all of the Executive Orders necessary to end this damnable curse!! Do what you will - and vote for the devil in disquise. The American voter has been digging their own grave for many years - and frankly - I believe that most Americans have forgotten how to make real decisions when it comes to keeping the American Dream and the American Experience meaningful and alive. Can you say: VIVA MEXICO? PRACTICE. Posted by: MJB on October 1, 2006 11:23 PMSeptember 28, 2006
Napa Growers Whine for More Workers; May Have to Mechanize "It’s A Luxury For Us To Have The [Illegal] Workforce That We Have" "If Congress passes a law imposing strict penalties and fines for The hell with these people. Every year they bring in hundreds and thousands of migrants and then the migrants never return to Mexico. They are nothing but coyotes. If they get 1 illegal, they should be raided by the ICE agents. Who cares if the price of wine goes up? There is really no damn reason the growers have to have illegals. Posted by: Bonnie on September 28, 2006 12:50 PMThere are 20 to 30 million or more people illegally in this country and not one of their sorry a$$es will pack a damned grape? Then, why in the world would we need to import more of them, when they won't pick a damned grape? What are they going to do for a living once they get here, if they won't pick a damned grape? If someone comes into this country to do an agricultural job, they should never ever get to do anything else in this country. If they want to do something else, they can go back to their homeland and do just that? I am so very tired of agriculture's incessant whining, their belief that the rest of need to pay so they can offer cheap wages. Don't grape growers get government subsidies? Why don't some of these subsidies go to increase wages so that American agricultural workers can have those jobs and make a living wage. Wine is a luxury item--it is not a necessity to life. How about using low level convicts to pick grapes. Hell, a lot of them have winemaking experience in prison cause they have made pruno. They would appreciate picking a grape or two. Does this make sense to anyone or has the death of common sense become complete in this country? Posted by: jaded on September 28, 2006 03:31 PMYou are correct Bonnie and I feel the same way about them. Austrailia mechanized it's wine industry a long time ago, and guess what? It works. Posted by: Bobby on September 28, 2006 03:43 PMIf certain sectors of our economy need migrant workers, then there is no reason, none, why they need to be illegal aliens. There should be a way for the industries to work with government to get legal workers that we know who they are and their whereabouts. There is no reason why millions of illegals need to come here for x number of jobs, under the guise that we need them for jobs like those in the wine country. ONCE WE GET THE ILLEGAL ALIENS OUT WE WON'T NEED SO MUCH FRUIT AND VEGETABLES Its a dog chasing its tail, over population begets the need for more workers. Cut population and we won't need so much harvest. Posted by: Softwarengineer on September 28, 2006 06:03 PMMy God! This is what we have been saying for so long! Europe has long used robotics and mechanization..if they can do it, so can we! I'm so sick of the excuses! Posted by: takn on September 28, 2006 07:26 PMTime to get into the machine age, if they are so particular about their crops they should have more kids to work in their farms like they did in the old days. I don't drink so I don't care about who picks the wine grapes. I had to quit buying Pepsi because they support illegals. Don't feel bad if the uptowners have to pay more for their wine. Posted by: HELEN on September 28, 2006 10:14 PMI wholeheartedly agree with all of you. If businesses can't afford to pay a decent wage to their employees, they don't need to be in business. Posted by: Ella on September 29, 2006 12:02 AMThe vineyards in Australia have been using mechanization for some time; and, believe me, it hasn't hurt the quality of their wines nor the quantity that they sell worldwide. From the inexpensive wines to the fine wines costing hundreds of dollars a bottle, Australian wine is recognized as among the best in the world. Posted by: D Flinchum on September 29, 2006 10:22 AMThey reason these cry baby grape growers are having trouble getting workers is NOT becouse of a shortage of illegal aleins.Its becouse now that there are so many in our country and they are doing all kinds of jobs, picking fruit is something illegal immigrants just wont do anymore. They can make alot more money by putting a hard working U.S. citizen out of work. Posted by: american citizen on September 30, 2006 05:44 PMWith an unlimited number of "legal" H2-A visas available, it's not about the availability of workers, it's about profit...employers pay for those visas, and are required to follow the provisions of providing housing or a housing allowance, meal breaks, workman's comp among the rules, but they know they can exploit illegals and not have to follow the rules... I say cutting off the illegals is the best thing we can do, because growers will realize that it's cheaper to simply offer decent wages and employ legal immigrants and Americans and if Congress had any cajone's, they would demand that employers look to welfare recipients, the homeless and even convict labor for their workforce...we need to stop the dole! Posted by: takn on October 2, 2006 11:34 AMSeptember 27, 2006
Border Patrol Agents in Trouble For Telling the Truth Must File "Significant Incident" Report After Meeting Congressman; Form is the Same One Used for Shooting Incidents "Congressional members interviewed by the newspaper said they were GOVERNMENT WORKERS CAN NOT SPEAK FOR THEIR AGENCY In this case, the border guards appeared correct writing their Incident Reports. It protects them from "speaking for their agency". A caveat though, since high level government officials were present, the Incident Reports should have been approved by border guard leadership before publishing them. This was likely the case? If so, the complaint/paranoia by Congressional members is unfounded, as this is normal protocol and protects the government agency members involved. I'm sure Congressional Committee members call their chairman before going to the press too. Posted by: Softwarengineer on September 27, 2006 04:11 PMI guess freedom of expressoin no longer applies if you work for the government or in this case the border patrol. Brian Posted by: Brian on September 27, 2006 04:37 PMWe are now close to living in a dictatorship. Both parties agree on such things as not allowing congresssman to talk to U.S. Border patrol agents. Is it just the Bush administration involved in treason, or was his father also involved. Or does it go back to Reagan and into the passed. Terrorism? I think Hannity and Limbaugh and o'Riley and the rest should start talking about what is happening right in our country. Who exactly do these people we vote for , represent? Posted by: Bobby on September 27, 2006 04:48 PMAny person should be allow to express their thoughts regardless of whether it agrees with the "party line" of the administration. Supposely Congressmen are smart enough to know that there is disagreement with the party line. Also after 30 years of working in different federal agencies, I have never seen a Congressman running around without senior people. The only reason you would ask for something like a 'Special interest" is cover your self when you after someone. Posted by: Beckyal on September 27, 2006 05:52 PMWhat is the difference between having "situational awareness" of high-profile visitors and "keeping tabs" on congressmen(high-profile visitors)? This is a semantical ploy used by the U. S. Customs and Border Protection's leadership to immediately get on top of a negative story/incident. I worked breifly in law enforcement as a criminal sheriff's deputy and I never had to write up an Incident Report (Significant/Special or Other) if high-proifled persons were about. I know there are different rules for different agencies but this seems unusual. This is an agency whose leadership in my humble opinion that doesn't want to get caught with their drawers around their ankles. Here are a couple of mottos they should strive for: "Do it RIGHT the first time", and or "Be All(The Best) you can be". When you're following the laws that conform with the U. S. Constitution to the best of your ability, lead by example, and demand no less of those aspiring to leadership everything falls neatly into place. There is no need to look over each agent's shoulder or live in a constant state of paranoia. No need to come up with excuses as to why Significant Incident Reports are used when there hasn't been a shooting/etc. I can tell you that this type of leadership is cause for despair amongst the American People and the agents working in that enviroment. Posted by: United Statesian on September 27, 2006 07:01 PMI called the Arizona border patrol 5 times starting in 2003 to report illegal aliens showing up, in a town, that is now 50% illegal aliens. I was told the same thing everytime by whatever rookie was answering the phone that day. What I was told and have reported before is that: "There are politicians in Az. that don't want the illegal aliens stopped." Nothing ever done with my reports, conspiracy comes to mind. Posted by: Bootinur on S |
Comments