FAIR Stein Report banner

Home Page

Recent Staff Contributions

Feds Obstruct Enforcement as Local Police Attempt to Move Forward

FAIR Analysis: House Health Care Reform Bill Will Burden American Taxpayers

Latest Research
The United States Is Already Over-Populated (2009)

FAIR Press Release
New Publication Exposes Tactics Used by Southern Poverty Law Center to Discredit Immigration Reform Groups

7 Principles of Immigration Reform

Resources & Links
Doing Research?
Visit some of the best immigration information sources on the internet.

Contact Us

All e-mail is subject to print, including your name. If you don't want us to publish your e-mail, or if you would like to remain anonymous, just let us know.

Add Stein Report headlines to your website or blog
Click here for instructions.

A notice to our readers: Comments on the Stein Report will only be posted when they seek to advance constructive debate and discussion, whether or not the poster agrees with the initial posting. Thank you.


 

Check out FAIR on:

Stein Report center image
October 07, 2009
 
 

Brookings Report Calls for More Skilled Immigration, Less Nepotism


The Brookings Institution released a report calling for more skilled immigration without lifting the overall (too high) level of legal immigration from around 1 million annually. The report calls for eliminating the extended family preference that has enabled chain migration for over a generation. The report also calls for a "trigger" of effective employer verification before any amnesty. But the larger flaw with the report is despite acknowledging that high-skilled immigration is more desirable than low-skilled, there is no attempt to determine what overall level of immigration would be beneficial, skilled or not. More commentary by Dan Stein in the full entry.

Comment from Dan Stein - This is just a restatement of what has been proposed by numerous "commissions" over the years, and it completely ignores the political reality of the way this issue is debated in Congress. Employer sanctions are already the law, and I am just wondering what this panel's proposal would add to such sanctions. This is the same sort of reasoning that gave us the disastrous Immigration Act of 1990 - nominally designed to increase the skills-family ratio but in fact raising both while increasing avenues for fraud and abuse.