|
|
December 18, 2007
Judge Rules You Can Hire Criminals With No Public Disclosure "A California appeals court Monday declined to overturn a judge's Comments
LEFT WING MEXIFORNIA IS A LOST CAUSE!
Posted by: American Me on December 18, 2007 03:55 PM Another traitor to American citizens who should be recalled immediately. I wonder how tuff he is on American citizens, in his courtroom. Barf. Posted by: Bobby on December 18, 2007 04:38 PM HEY FBI, YA FOUND OUT SHARPTON LIKELY HAD HIS HAND IN THE COOKIE JAR Here's a judge with chocolate chip smudged all over his face. Posted by: Softwarengineer on December 18, 2007 06:39 PM This issue must be taken to the highest court possible. This decision, on it's face, is beyond the pale. Posted by: Bob Hubble on December 18, 2007 08:39 PM it is the courts who destroyed AMERICA they are the ones who overturned prop 187 and they are the ones who maintain that the 14 amendment stands for illeglas and ISLAMIC terrorists, they said we must educate the children of illegals, Posted by: impeachbush on December 18, 2007 11:15 PM CA is the sh*t. This is what happens when you elect liberals to a majority for 30-40 years, they appoint idiot liberals to every court and board thereby creating a dynasty. We ought to fence off CA and make those people suffer with what they have created. Don't let them flee to other states and mind pollute those areas too. Posted by: arthur on December 19, 2007 02:14 PM These people have no standing therefore the judge is wrong! Posted by: mike on December 20, 2007 05:18 PM |
decision that bars the public from knowing who hires migrant day-laborers in Vista. Three news organizations, including The San Diego Union-Tribune, had appealed Superior Court Judge Michael Orfield's decision barring Vista officials from making public the identities of employers registered under the city's day-laborer law. The 4th District Court of Appeal in San Diego rejected the petition Monday without giving a reason," the San Diego Union Tribune reports. "In July, the ACLU petitioned the Superior Court for an injunction to stop the release of the employers' information, citing privacy rights. Two months later, Judge Orfield issued a preliminary injunction ordering Vista to stop releasing the information, saying that the employers' right to privacy superseded the public's right to know in this case." [FAIR's legal affiliate group IRLI is involved in this litigation. The next step in the case is likely a trial on the suit.]