|
|
April 11, 2007
The Decider Becomes the Defeatist "Not all incremental progress is equal in the eyes of President Bush. When it Comments
I see that Bush is spreading his Bushcrap in Arizona, this is an effort to destroy us Americans! Bush and the Bushites are putting Posted by: William Kiker on April 11, 2007 11:32 AM CUT AND RAN We have already ran from Constitutional law enforcement in America and for decades. America's Organized Crime Employers are enjoying the highest profits ever with this illegal slave labor and its making it almost impossible for legal companies to compete with them fairly. FAIRUS.ORG is leading the FIGHT against this abomination!!! See the proof: http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=/Nation/archive/200701/NAT20070109b.html Posted by: Softwarengineer on April 11, 2007 11:39 AM Does Bush actually believe that anyone living in AZ gives a crap about what he thinks on illegal immigration. Brian Posted by: Brian on April 11, 2007 12:06 PM What is the difference in the terrorism war being waged in Iraq and Afghanistan and the terrorrism war being waged on our Southern border? The war on our Southern border (and it is a war like it or not) is not being taken seriously. The war on our Southern border is undeclared, underfunded, laughed at by our politicians and is being waged on U.S. soil. It may be more of a threat than Iraq. Posted by: Sick 'n Tired on April 11, 2007 12:51 PM It is a good question Brian. I wonder about Jeff Flake to. I wrote about this clown in previous posts months back, and he did'nt dissapoint me. It turns out he partners with one of the biggest Raza supporters to push amnesty down Americans throats. Team Tancredo.org, a few bucks when possible, or there will be no debate and there will be an amnesty. Posted by: Bobby on April 11, 2007 01:04 PM I'm in Arizona and I don't give a crap. My only hope right now is that he gets stopped from putting through his agenda until we get a President that represents the will of the people. I think the only way to get anything done until then is for States and Counties to enforce the law and put new local laws in place to protect citizens from invasion and harm. We always feel violated and stupid when he comes here to insult our intelligence. Great article and great idea from Fairus.org! Thanks SWE Posted by: Kristina on April 11, 2007 01:25 PM WE NEED TO FOCUS ON BOOSH'S AMNESTY...THE "DECIDER" AND THE DEMS NEED I'm primarily known in the real world as a life-long photographer. I see most things in photographic terms. We need to FOCUS on the "targets of opertunity" in this lead up to the most critical election since the civil war. AMNESTY needs to be the "A" word thrown at BOOSH and the DEMS with equal disgust and political contempt! "BOOSH" is a wonderful accusatory handle, that more and more people are using to put the evil, stupid,frankly, "EMBARASSING DOPE" in the spotlight!Use that term too! The average American needs to understand, that the RIGHT MAINSTREAM is anti-BOOSH even more than the FAR LEFT. It's true! Many on the right see BOOSH as the political equivolent of the late JEFFRY DAHMER...The notorious CANNIBAL KILLER! We, on the right are very much against BOOSH. He has almost no base, anymore. We have to pound on him with no rhetorical mercy. We need to link him to the equally stupid DEMS. JOINT GUILT by association. After 50 years the "N" word has become a ticket to instant political termination...As well it should be! The "A" word: AMNESTY, likewise, needs to become REPUGNANT to all that hear it ! All who favor it need to be seen as the worst of the worst! We need a fence, for sure!!! but we need a new THIRD RAIL in the POLITICAL REALM..."AMNESTY"...that no rational candidate would dare to utter in a positive sense.The magic word must be burned onto the forheads of the AMNESTY TRAITORS...heat up the branding iron. BOOSH, GUILIANI, McCAIN, CLINTON and OBAMA need to be marked with a figurative 2 inch "A" ... right above their eyes! Posted by: Allan S. on April 11, 2007 01:41 PM From the Border Patrol Union Website: President Bush made another visit to Yuma to tout his AMNESTY plan for illegal aliens. Bush says it is "impractical" to deport the illegal aliens already here. We strongly disagree. Bush is parroted by top BP managers, who are now openly advocating amnesty. We're still waiting on the explanation from any politician or manager as to why we should continue to risk our lives stopping illegal immigration when they are going to legalize everyone anyway. The American public should not be so naive as to accept this premise that "if we legalize everyone we won't have an illegal immigration problem anymore". What will really happen is a repeat of the 1986 amnesty debacle. That debacle included out of control fraud, a massive increase in illegal immigration, and an overwhelmed system incapable of handling the onslaught of illegal aliens clamoring for amnesty. The proof is in the pudding, as we sit here 20 years later with a much worse problem than we had in 1986. Amnesty will not fix anything. We would argue to President Bush that it just isn't "practical" to persist in his attempts to shove another amnesty program down the throats of the American people. Please tell your local politicians to take the handcuffs off of Border Patrol agents and let us enforce the laws. YOU CAN PRACTICALLY DEPORT 12 MILLION ILLEGALS............ONE AT A TIME,LOL, ON A MASSIVE SCALE DAILY. Posted by: one who knows on April 11, 2007 03:00 PM THIS IS WHAT BOOSH AND THE REST OF THE TRAITOR POLITICIANS CHOOSE TO IGNORE AND MAKE UP LIES, ALL FOR THEIR POLITICAL AND FINANCIAL GAIN AT THE EXPENSE OF AMERICAN CITIZENS. http://www.judicialwatch.org/6251.shtml Posted by: American Me on April 11, 2007 03:38 PM I believe this border issue and the insecurity thereof under Bush, along with the vastly increased illegal alien population in the U.S. since Bush has been in office, truly typify and will remain as the Bush Legacy in years to come, if not perpetuity -- and that (I've said this all along and for quite a while now, and no longer than a year ago I was ridiculed by other Conservatives for saying so) Bush establishes his inability to manage national security by his many compromises as to border security (or lack thereof), and that includes Chertoff as head of National Security, someone so obviously aiding and assisting illegal immigration by one deflection after another (it's his behavior, it's his fruit in office, regardless of what he and what Bush have to say about it: they are conducive and indulgent as to illegal immigration and are not assisting securing the border nor eliminating and penalizing the problems). For key example, soon after the legislation was signed into law (ahem) to construct the Border Fence, Chertoff was quoted as saying to various "mayors of border towns" along our Southern border, after he made a tour of the border and met with these mayors, that he'd encouraged them to know that "the fence will not be built." AFTER it was signed into law. Chertoff dealing with border mayors advising them otherwise. What sort of national security is THAT? Secret, private deals and agreements made with "border mayors" as to our NATIONAL POLICIES and SECURITY at the decision of mayors of a few towns/cities and Chertoff? Who made Chertoff the Legislative Branch? Who even elected the guy (answer is obvious). He's not King of Security, he's a Cabinet member. Nor is Bush King of America, he's an elected official supposedly there to REPRESENT THE VOTERS, not to tell us what he's decided to do, same as Congress (though you'd never know it today from any of them, they do seem to be operating on a concept of Monarchy and not democracy). Back to the issue...we the voters are not being represented in D.C. nor in our states. We're being ordered about by other countries, given the amount of "listening" and "agreement" that our elected officials are making with people from other nations while disallowing the opinions of U.S. voters and citizens. Bush has spent his entire time in office acting very concerned about "the people of (fill in the name of another country here, usually Iraq and Mexico)" and speaking volumes about all he's doing with the taxpayers' dollars for "the people of..." and yet here we are at home, wondering where OUR service return is. The border issue and the inability to deport illegal aliens from the U.s. and alll the efforting from D.C. particularly to service illegal aliens rather than penalize them (as also those who traffic in and/or profit from them otherwise) is what's cost the current D.C. crowd their credibility. If they're seriously there to represent their constituents (that means, the voters), then they better start enforcing the laws and take swift measures to secure our borders, assist the U.S. citizens with our concerns and stop pandering to the likes of Microsoft and agriculture in CA (and elsewhere). There ARE no jobs Americans won't do. Bush saying this over and over again is so insulting as to be him intentionally sticking his finger in the eye of U.S. voters -- it's as if he really, really does not like the voters and needs to remind us every time he says that phrase (that illegal aliens are in the U.S. doing jobs Americans won't do). Who in the Sam Hill dose Bush (and others who think like this) THINK WAS DOING ALL THESE 'JOBS' BEFOR E ILLEGALS ARRIVED? Jobs were done by Americans. We swept the floors, tilled the fields, picked the fruit, cleaned the pools, raised our children, drove our trucks, answered our phones, changed the sheets, served the food...we, Americans, we did all that, we built this nation. It's time D.C. and state legislatures stopped courting and sparking with illegal aliens just because they commisserate with them as to pocketing dollars and get with the voters. It's way past time, actually. Posted by: -S- on April 11, 2007 03:57 PM You know Allen, your right. The A word does not register as negative with many Americans. And the reason is simple. All of the negative things associated with it, have been kept as far from the American public by the Main Stream Media, as is possible. Or to put it your way, there isn't enough negative imagery associated with it in the minds of people. Even the phonetic sound of the word alone isn't that bad. It almost sounds nice. The images are missing, like the Mexican flags, racist comments to Americans etc. Tom Tancredo President-2008- Team Tancredo.org Posted by: Bobby on April 11, 2007 04:04 PM It's also incredibly counterproductive to hear President Bush -- HE'S THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES -- say that enforcing the law as to illegal immigration "isn't practical." That is, that's his comment about enforcing the penalty of deportation to the crime of illegal immigration. Bush says "it's not going to happen...it's just not practical." So what if it's not practical? That does not mean that the laws should not be applied nor enforced, nor that just because something's "impractical" that it can be not done. Solving this problem is tough, impractical and difficult but we have to solve it and we have to solve it now. Every.single.time I hear Bush speak so hopelessly and weakly about this issue of border insecurity and illegal alien population in the U.S./illegal immigration (same with McCain, who speaks similarly, same with Guiliani, same with Bloomberg, same with many other RINOs in office, certainly the going perspective by nearly all Democrats, and I include Bush among them lately), every.single.time I hear these weak, woeful comments of how impossible or impractical enforcement is or would be, I hear a weak and leaderless nation... I voted twice for Bush. I'm no Liberal. I don't criticise people I vote for easily. But about this issue, there is just no way Bush can maintain his strong personna on defense and security while being quite so incredibly weak on the issue of illegal immigration. His solution? SELL legality to illegals. I thought I'd heard just about all there is to be upset about already until I read that last thing from Bush's / these Republicans deciding the Bush immigration plan, until I read that: for $3,500. anyone can stay in the U.S. as a "legal" resident, even when they're an "illegal alien" (I paraphrase). Selling legality is the epitome of...well...just ask your local law enforcement how they respond when someone tries to buy their way into "legality"...this is entirely pitiful, a non-solution, an amnesty. Worse, it's like selling citizenship. Certainly it is selling residency. Posted by: -S- on April 11, 2007 04:08 PM Bush makes me sick! Our country is going down the toliet and he wants amnesty? I think not! I am job searching and wages are low they are they same as ten years ago. What is wrong with that picture and the middle class is struggling and they have done nothing for average joe. Education and gas prices are insane along with health care costs and what has he done for me lately? Posted by: Heather on April 11, 2007 06:44 PM Robert Rector at the Heritage foundation has a new study that asserts that EACH AND EVERY IT IS THE PATH TO NATIONAL RUIN & BANKRUPTCY! IT IS ALMOST TOO LATE FOR AMERICA! IF THE If you have any gumption left...Fight them politically as if they were coming with bayonets. Posted by: Allan S. on April 11, 2007 10:25 PM -S-, YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT! THEY ARE SUGGESTING ILLEGAL ALIENS PAY A FINE FOR THEIR CITIZENSHIP. THE MONEY THEY HAVE DERIVED FROM OUR ECONOMY. THE LEGAL U.S. CITIZEN'S MONIES. THE ILLEGAL ALIENS ARE BEING GIVEN OUR MONEY. PAYING A FINE WOULD MEAN, PAYING A FINE WITH THE U.S. CITIZENS MONEY. ME AND YOURS - TAXPAYERS MONEY! ILLEGAL ALIENS AREN'T EVEN SUPPOSE TO BE HERE! THEY AREN'T EVEN SUPPOSE TO HAVE ACCESS TO OUR PIGGY BANK. THEY SEND CRAP LOADS OUT OF OUR ECONOMY. CONTINUE TO TAKE TAKE TAKE. AND NOW THEY'RE SUGGESTING PAYING A FINE - WITH OUR MONEY?! MONEY OUR ECONOMY HAS CREATED - THAT THEY ARE TAKING - ALONG WITH ALL OF THE SYSTEMS AND SERVICES. Posted by: litew8 on April 12, 2007 03:19 AM |
occurs in Iraq, it is a sign that we need to forge ahead despite all difficulties. When it occurs on our southern border, it is deemed insufficient and a sign that — to use a favorite GOP phrase — we need to settle on a 'surrender date' on immigration enforcement. That date would be whenever Bush’s latest 'comprehensive' reform proposal kicked in. He wants to legalize illegal immigrants already here and invite in 'temporary' guest workers. When Congress finishes with it, this probably will be another proposal to solve the illegal-immigrant problem by making all immigrants past and future legal. This is the immigration-enforcement version of 'declare victory and go home,'" writes Rich Lowry in National Review. "The administration contradicts itself on enforcement. On the one hand, it touts the success of increased border patrols and occasional workplace raids, because it realizes, politically, that it has to be seen as trying to enforce the laws. On the other hand, it argues that enforcement can’t possibly work, so we have to adopt an amnesty and guest-worker program. The rational response to the promising signs from enforcement would be to do more of it, and to avoid undercutting its early success. But on immigration, the Bushies are — again, to use a term from the Iraq debate — defeatists."