FAIR Stein Report banner

Home Page

Read Articles and Entries From FAIR Staff

Napolitano Misstates U.S. Immigration Law During CNN Interview

Recent Polls Show Lack of Support for Amnesty

Latest Research
The Cost of Illegal Immigration to Nevadans

FAIR press release
FAIR Applauds Administration's Plan to Reduce Border Violence

7 Principles of Immigration Reform

Resources & Links
Doing research?
Visit some of the best immigration information sources on the internet.

Contact the Stein Report
All e-mail is subject to print, including your name. If you don't want us to publish your e-mail, or if you would like to remain anonymous, just let us know.

Add Stein Report headlines to your website or blog
Click here for instructions.

A notice to our readers: Comments on the Stein Report will only be posted when they seek to advance constructive debate and discussion, whether or not the poster agrees with the initial posting. Thank you.

Stein Report center image
June 16, 2006
 
 

Federal Judge Backs Detention of Illegal Aliens in Important Ruling


"A federal judge in Brooklyn ruled yesterday that the government has wide latitude under immigration law to detain noncitizens on the basis of religion, race or national origin, and to hold them indefinitely without explanation. The ruling came in a class-action lawsuit by Muslim immigrants detained after 9/11, and it dismissed several key claims the detainees had made against the government. But the judge, John Gleeson of United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, allowed the lawsuit to continue on other claims, mostly that the conditions of confinement were abusive and unconstitutional. Judge Gleeson's decision requires top federal officials, including former Attorney General John Ashcroft and Robert S. Mueller III, the F.B.I. director, to answer to those accusations under oath," the New York Times reports. "In his 99-page ruling, Judge Gleeson rejected the government's argument that the events of Sept. 11 justified extraordinary measures to confine noncitizens who fell under suspicion, or that the attacks heightened top officials' need for government immunity to combat future threats to national security without fear of being sued. But his interpretation of immigration law gave the government broad discretion to enforce the law selectively against noncitizens of a particular religion, race or national origin, and to detain them indefinitely, for any unspecified reason, after an immigration judge had ordered them removed from the country."

Read the full story