FAIR Stein Report banner

Home Page

Read Articles and Entries From FAIR Staff

Napolitano Misstates U.S. Immigration Law During CNN Interview

Recent Polls Show Lack of Support for Amnesty

Latest Research
The Cost of Illegal Immigration to Nevadans

FAIR press release
FAIR Applauds Administration's Plan to Reduce Border Violence

7 Principles of Immigration Reform

Resources & Links
Doing research?
Visit some of the best immigration information sources on the internet.

Contact the Stein Report
All e-mail is subject to print, including your name. If you don't want us to publish your e-mail, or if you would like to remain anonymous, just let us know.

Add Stein Report headlines to your website or blog
Click here for instructions.

A notice to our readers: Comments on the Stein Report will only be posted when they seek to advance constructive debate and discussion, whether or not the poster agrees with the initial posting. Thank you.

Stein Report center image
December 13, 2004
 
 

DHS NOMINEE DONE IN BY NANNYGATE, OTHER SCANDALS


Former NYPD Commissioner Bernard Kerik withdrew from consideration as the next head of DHS after details of his illegal alien nanny and multiple affairs came to light. The New York Daily News focuses in its report on the multiple alleged affairs that Kerik had, including one with the editor of his recently published book. According to the LA Times, open-borders groups were happy at the news of Kerik's nanny. Angela Kelly of the National Immigration Forum gave "a small cheer" at the news. "It was not that I didn't want him to become secretary of Homeland Security, but more because it speaks to how far the reach is of our broken immigration system," she told the Times.

More from Michelle Malkin:

"A few other thoughts on Bernard Kerik's withdrawal :

First, it puts an end to feminist complaints that only women nominees are penalized for having 'nanny problems.'

Second, it keeps a white-hot spotlight on many of the issues raised by maverick House Republicans during the "intel reform"/border security debate, including the push for secure documentation, improved employer verification of Social Security numbers, and strengthening of penalties for immigration-related fraud.

Third, it puts a much-needed focus on the need to enforce federal employer sanctions. Why is it that the only employers who ever seem to suffer consequences for hiring illegal immigrants are Cabinet nominees?! In 2002, the federal government fined only 13 employers nationwide for hiring illegal immigrants. Enforcement of employer sanctions has been a nationwide joke for the last two decades."